Conclusion is......
> Mark stole the PZKut to share.
>
> Sincerely,
> Investigator Francis Bacon

I'm just glad to know that people realize my alibi was totally true.

Brian
TeamGreenDragon

brian, mark has the pzkut but that does not mean that we believe your alibi
was totally true. come on now, how much of it did he share with you?
smile
uneksia

-------Original Message-------


Conclusion is......
> Mark stole the PZKut to share.
>
> Sincerely,
> Investigator Francis Bacon

I'm just glad to know that people realize my alibi was totally true.

Brian
TeamGreenDragon

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

I thought the description of the letterboxing game was a hoot!

Wisconsin Hiker

----- Original Message -----
From: "Brian, Ryan & Lori"
Date: Monday, May 22, 2006 11:45 pm
Subject: [LbNA] Re: Case Solved
To: letterbox-usa@yahoogroups.com

I'm just glad to know that people realize my alibi was totally true.

Brian

Hi there,

I know I very rarely post, so the vast majority of you have no idea
who I am. I just wanted to say "Thanks!" to those who planned this
thing for the fun mystery and for giving me something to tear my hair
out over. I'm still quite flabbergasted. There are so many
incredible decipherers in this hobby, I'm more than a little
overwhelmed that I'm the one who figured it out.

And Mark, now that you've been outed - what's the deal? Are you
giving DMS back his stash, or what? Please, give it back! If there
was any one catalyst pushing me forward to find an answer, it's that
I could no longer withstand his contant wheezing and whining and
wimpering! I just can't listen to it any more!



--- In letterbox-usa@yahoogroups.com, Francis Bacon
wrote:
>
> Dear Fellow Letterboxers,
>
> It gives me great pleasure to announce that the
> Purloined PZ Kut Caper has been solved. Before the
> winner is announced there are a few acknowledgments in
> order.
>
> Many thanks to the victim, suspects and culprit
> in this mystery who participated on faith, not knowing
> who was asking them to join in, nor what their role
> would be. I appreciate their involvement, entertaining
> banter and good sportsmanship. My hat is off to Der
> Mad Stamper, Don & Gwen, Stealthboxxer, Green Tortuga,
> Poison Ivy, Sewsowbizzy, BarefootLucy, SpringChick,
> TeamGreenDragon and Mark & Sue. Without their willing
> participation this little suspense for your enjoyment
> would not have been possible.
>
> Congratulations to RaqsEnigma whose perseverance
> and many long hours has paid off in fingering none
> other than Mark Pepe as the culprit. While many have
> submitted guesses and logical deductions it is
> RaqsEnigma who broke the code and submitted the
> correct answer...... Mark Share. Conclusion is......
> Mark stole the PZKut to share.
>
> Sincerely,
> Investigator Francis Bacon
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>

Dear Letterboxing Community,

It is my pleasure to announce that "The Case of
the Missing Store of Good Manners" is solved.
Congratulations go to Gary, a new boxer, who has
exhibited patience, persistence, and many skills in
the solving of this case.

The solution:

We are all guilty.
"Unless someone like you cares a whole awful lot,
nothing is going to get better, it's not."

The clues to the actual letterbox will be posted
in the near future. Thank you once again, to all those
who played the game. The accused individuals were
those who set excellent examples of the etiquette
needed for the convivial survival of letterboxing. One
would do well to heed their advice.

Truly,

Ms. Emily Post





____________________________________________________________________________________
We won't tell. Get more on shows you hate to love
(and love to hate): Yahoo! TV's Guilty Pleasures list.
http://tv.yahoo.com/collections/265

--- In letterbox-usa@yahoogroups.com, "Ms. Emily Post"
wrote:
>

>
> We are all guilty.

Yawn...

Brian
TeamGreenDragon

My sentiments exactly....

I had typed a lot to go here, and in retrospect decided to keep my
mouth shut.

VanMan

--- In letterbox-usa@yahoogroups.com, "Brian, Ryan & Lori"
wrote:
>
> --- In letterbox-usa@yahoogroups.com, "Ms. Emily Post"
> wrote:
> >
>
> >
> > We are all guilty.
>
> Yawn...
>
> Brian
> TeamGreenDragon
>

if you decided to keep your mouth shut, then why didn't you?
smile
uneksia


-------Original Message-------

My sentiments exactly....

I had typed a lot to go here, and in retrospect decided to keep my
mouth shut.

VanMan

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Well said, uneksia. I was thinking the same thing myself!

Enjoy!
donutz716

P.S. Congrats to Gary for solving the case!

uneksia wrote:
if you decided to keep your mouth shut, then why didn't you?
smile
uneksia


-------Original Message-------

My sentiments exactly....

I had typed a lot to go here, and in retrospect decided to keep my
mouth shut.

VanMan

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]






---------------------------------
Choose the right car based on your needs. Check out Yahoo! Autos new Car Finder tool.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

At 09:46 AM 6/28/2007, you wrote:
>Well said, uneksia. I was thinking the same thing myself!
>
> Enjoy!
> donutz716
>
> P.S. Congrats to Gary for solving the case!

Thanks, donutz716, and uneksia. I considered sending a post to the
two "yawners",,, it appears like maybe they're leading a boring
life. Maybe they'd like the challenge of solving that mystery,,,
that would take away their boredom. ;-) I wasn't bored, anyway. Of
course, if they're not capable of "thinking outside the box", they
needn't try. BUT, it could be good for them... I hear things like
this, and Sudoku puzzles, etc. help ward off Alzheimer's
Disease. HEY, if a 60 year old carpenter from Arkansas can solve it,
surely they can. So, fellows, IF you decide to take up the
challenge, keep me posted on your progress, if you will. :-D

Gary



>uneksia wrote:
> if you decided to keep your mouth shut, then why didn't you?
>smile
>uneksia
>
>
>-------Original Message-------
>
>My sentiments exactly....
>
>I had typed a lot to go here, and in retrospect decided to keep my
>mouth shut.
>
>VanMan
>
>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
>
>
>---------------------------------
>Choose the right car based on your needs. Check out Yahoo! Autos
>new Car Finder tool.
>
>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Just don't snore and wake anyone up.

~~ Mosey ~~


--- In letterbox-usa@yahoogroups.com, "Brian, Ryan & Lori"
wrote:
>
> --- In letterbox-usa@yahoogroups.com, "Ms. Emily Post"
> wrote:
> >
>
> >
> > We are all guilty.
>
> Yawn...
>
> Brian
> TeamGreenDragon
>

> Of course, if they're not capable of "thinking outside the box",

Well, that pretty much says it all about me.

> So, fellows, IF you decide to take up the
> challenge, keep me posted on your progress, if you will. :-D


Yeah, I'll get right on that.

Brian
TeamGreenDragon

garyliza@arkwest.com wrote:
> At 09:46 AM 6/28/2007, you wrote:
>
>> Well said, uneksia. I was thinking the same thing myself!
>>
>> Enjoy!
>> donutz716
>>
>> P.S. Congrats to Gary for solving the case!
>>
>
> Thanks, donutz716, and uneksia. I considered sending a post to the
> two "yawners",,, it appears like maybe they're leading a boring
> life. Maybe they'd like the challenge of solving that mystery,,,
> that would take away their boredom. ;-) I wasn't bored, anyway. Of
> course, if they're not capable of "thinking outside the box", they
> needn't try. BUT, it could be good for them... I hear things like
> this, and Sudoku puzzles, etc. help ward off Alzheimer's
> Disease. HEY, if a 60 year old carpenter from Arkansas can solve it,
> surely they can. So, fellows, IF you decide to take up the
> challenge, keep me posted on your progress, if you will. :-D
>
> Gary
>
>

HAHAHA, you have no idea, no idea at all.

--
Nathan Brown

AKA Cyclonic
Penncoasters.com

The Insensitivity rolls on...

Real men don't do virtual letterboxes or pastels!

-
Some of us were just not interested in this and are still not interested in it.
>
> Thanks, donutz716, and uneksia. I considered sending a post to the
> two "yawners",,, it appears like maybe they're leading a boring
> life. Maybe they'd like the challenge of solving that mystery,,,
> that would take away their boredom. ;-) I wasn't bored, anyway. Of
> course, if they're not capable of "thinking outside the box", they
> needn't try. BUT, it could be good for them... I hear things like
> this, and Sudoku puzzles, etc. help ward off Alzheimer's
> Disease. HEY, if a 60 year old carpenter from Arkansas can solve it,
> surely they can. So, fellows, IF you decide to take up the
> challenge, keep me posted on your progress, if you will. :-D
>
> Gary

At 02:57 PM 6/29/2007, mizscarlet731@yahoo.com wrote:
>-
>Some of us were just not interested in this and are still not
>interested in it.
> >
> > Thanks, donutz716, and uneksia. I considered sending a post to the

Oh, I can understand someone not being interested,,,, it does seem
strange to me, though, why someone would read and REPLY to posts on
subjects they aren't interested in. :-)

Gary

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

You slay me, Brian. Muwahahah!

--- In letterbox-usa@yahoogroups.com, "Brian, Ryan & Lori"
wrote:
>
> > Of course, if they're not capable of "thinking outside the box",
>
> Well, that pretty much says it all about me.
>
> > So, fellows, IF you decide to take up the
> > challenge, keep me posted on your progress, if you will. :-D
>
>
> Yeah, I'll get right on that.
>
> Brian
> TeamGreenDragon
>

Reading the posts that were at least the first post in a new subject line
was kind of necessary in order to find out that, yet again, it was about the
same ol' subject. I read the case closed subject line because that was, to
me, yippee yippee yippee, case solved and case OVER.

Someone mentioned thinking outside the box. If it WAS thinking outside the
box, it might have been interesting. Unfortunately, it was a been
there/done that for the list. Same ol' same ol'. There was no thinking
outside the box. It got old the second time around. Or was this the third
time around already?

~~ Mosey ~~

-----Original Message-----
From: letterbox-usa@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:letterbox-usa@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of Gary & Elizabeth
Anderson
Sent: Friday, June 29, 2007 3:36 PM
To: letterbox-usa@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [LbNA] Re: Case Solved


At 02:57 PM 6/29/2007, mizscarlet731@yahoo.com wrote:
>-
>Some of us were just not interested in this and are still not
>interested in it.
> >
> > Thanks, donutz716, and uneksia. I considered sending a post to the

Oh, I can understand someone not being interested,,,, it does seem
strange to me, though, why someone would read and REPLY to posts on
subjects they aren't interested in. :-)

Gary

At 03:57 PM 6/29/2007, Mosey wrote:
>Reading the posts that were at least the first post in a new subject line
>was kind of necessary in order to find out that, yet again, it was about the
>same ol' subject. I read the case closed subject line because that was, to
>me, yippee yippee yippee, case solved and case OVER.
>
>Someone mentioned thinking outside the box. If it WAS thinking outside the
>box, it might have been interesting. Unfortunately, it was a been
>there/done that for the list. Same ol' same ol'. There was no thinking
>outside the box. It got old the second time around. Or was this the third
>time around already?
>
>~~ Mosey ~~

Hey, Mosey,,,

NOW, I'm *really* confused... By the time I mentioned "thinking
outside the box", it was the 6th post under the subject line "Case
Solved" (NOT a subject line of "Thinking Outside the Box"). IF in
fact, as you stated above: "I read the case closed subject line
because that was, to me, yippee yippee yippee, case solved and case
OVER." I'm NOW wondering, WHY isn't your 'delete' button worn out by
deleting those posts with subject line: "Case Solved", instead of
reading and REPLYING to the 11th post under this subject line? I'm
new to this forum, and don't know what is the second, or third time
around, but, it still seems strange to me that a subject that doesn't
interest certain folks still gets read, and REPLIED to. Can you enlighten me?

Gary

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

How 'bout 'cause we're no longer reading the obnoxious posts about the case?
These posts aren't "The Case", so there's no reason not to read them. If
you're still confused, I fear you need more help than is going to come from
me.

~~ Mosey ~~

-----Original Message-----
From: letterbox-usa@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:letterbox-usa@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of Gary & Elizabeth
Anderson
Sent: Friday, June 29, 2007 5:56 PM
To: letterbox-usa@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [LbNA] Re: Case Solved


At 03:57 PM 6/29/2007, Mosey wrote:
>Reading the posts that were at least the first post in a new subject line
>was kind of necessary in order to find out that, yet again, it was about
the
>same ol' subject. I read the case closed subject line because that was, to
>me, yippee yippee yippee, case solved and case OVER.
>
>Someone mentioned thinking outside the box. If it WAS thinking outside the
>box, it might have been interesting. Unfortunately, it was a been
>there/done that for the list. Same ol' same ol'. There was no thinking
>outside the box. It got old the second time around. Or was this the third
>time around already?
>
>~~ Mosey ~~

Hey, Mosey,,,

NOW, I'm *really* confused... By the time I mentioned "thinking
outside the box", it was the 6th post under the subject line "Case
Solved" (NOT a subject line of "Thinking Outside the Box"). IF in
fact, as you stated above: "I read the case closed subject line
because that was, to me, yippee yippee yippee, case solved and case
OVER." I'm NOW wondering, WHY isn't your 'delete' button worn out by
deleting those posts with subject line: "Case Solved", instead of
reading and REPLYING to the 11th post under this subject line? I'm
new to this forum, and don't know what is the second, or third time
around, but, it still seems strange to me that a subject that doesn't
interest certain folks still gets read, and REPLIED to. Can you enlighten
me?

Gary

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




Yahoo! Groups Links

Oh, no,,, not confused now... I see the whole situation very clearly. :-)

Gary

At 06:11 PM 6/29/2007, you wrote:
>How 'bout 'cause we're no longer reading the obnoxious posts about the case?
>These posts aren't "The Case", so there's no reason not to read them. If
>you're still confused, I fear you need more help than is going to come from
>me.
>
>~~ Mosey ~~
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: letterbox-usa@yahoogroups.com
>[mailto:letterbox-usa@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of Gary & Elizabeth
>Anderson
>Sent: Friday, June 29, 2007 5:56 PM
>To: letterbox-usa@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: RE: [LbNA] Re: Case Solved
>
>
>At 03:57 PM 6/29/2007, Mosey wrote:
> >Reading the posts that were at least the first post in a new subject line
> >was kind of necessary in order to find out that, yet again, it was about
>the
> >same ol' subject. I read the case closed subject line because that was, to
> >me, yippee yippee yippee, case solved and case OVER.
> >
> >Someone mentioned thinking outside the box. If it WAS thinking outside the
> >box, it might have been interesting. Unfortunately, it was a been
> >there/done that for the list. Same ol' same ol'. There was no thinking
> >outside the box. It got old the second time around. Or was this the third
> >time around already?
> >
> >~~ Mosey ~~
>
>Hey, Mosey,,,
>
>NOW, I'm *really* confused... By the time I mentioned "thinking
>outside the box", it was the 6th post under the subject line "Case
>Solved" (NOT a subject line of "Thinking Outside the Box"). IF in
>fact, as you stated above: "I read the case closed subject line
>because that was, to me, yippee yippee yippee, case solved and case
>OVER." I'm NOW wondering, WHY isn't your 'delete' button worn out by
>deleting those posts with subject line: "Case Solved", instead of
>reading and REPLYING to the 11th post under this subject line? I'm
>new to this forum, and don't know what is the second, or third time
>around, but, it still seems strange to me that a subject that doesn't
>interest certain folks still gets read, and REPLIED to. Can you enlighten
>me?
>
>Gary
>
>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

I'm glad somebody knows what's going on. I'm a newbie and I'm lost....but from the tone, I'm guessing I really don't WANT to know what's going on.
Have a great weekend!

----- Original Message ----
From: Gary & Elizabeth Anderson
To: letterbox-usa@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, June 29, 2007 8:08:06 PM
Subject: RE: [LbNA] Re: Case Solved

Oh, no,,, not confused now... I see the whole situation very clearly. :-)

Gary

At 06:11 PM 6/29/2007, you wrote:
>How 'bout 'cause we're no longer reading the obnoxious posts about the case?
>These posts aren't "The Case", so there's no reason not to read them. If
>you're still confused, I fear you need more help than is going to come from
>me.
>
>~~ Mosey ~~
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: letterbox-usa@yahoogroups.com
>[mailto:letterbox-usa@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of Gary & Elizabeth
>Anderson
>Sent: Friday, June 29, 2007 5:56 PM
>To: letterbox-usa@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: RE: [LbNA] Re: Case Solved
>
>
>At 03:57 PM 6/29/2007, Mosey wrote:
> >Reading the posts that were at least the first post in a new subject line
> >was kind of necessary in order to find out that, yet again, it was about
>the
> >same ol' subject. I read the case closed subject line because that was, to
> >me, yippee yippee yippee, case solved and case OVER.
> >
> >Someone mentioned thinking outside the box. If it WAS thinking outside the
> >box, it might have been interesting. Unfortunately, it was a been
> >there/done that for the list. Same ol' same ol'. There was no thinking
> >outside the box. It got old the second time around. Or was this the third
> >time around already?
> >
> >~~ Mosey ~~
>
>Hey, Mosey,,,
>
>NOW, I'm *really* confused... By the time I mentioned "thinking
>outside the box", it was the 6th post under the subject line "Case
>Solved" (NOT a subject line of "Thinking Outside the Box"). IF in
>fact, as you stated above: "I read the case closed subject line
>because that was, to me, yippee yippee yippee, case solved and case
>OVER." I'm NOW wondering, WHY isn't your 'delete' button worn out by
>deleting those posts with subject line: "Case Solved", instead of
>reading and REPLYING to the 11th post under this subject line? I'm
>new to this forum, and don't know what is the second, or third time
>around, but, it still seems strange to me that a subject that doesn't
>interest certain folks still gets read, and REPLIED to. Can you enlighten
>me?
>
>Gary
>
>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




Yahoo! Groups Links









____________________________________________________________________________________
Got a little couch potato?
Check out fun summer activities for kids.
http://search.yahoo.com/search?fr=oni_on_mail&p=summer+activities+for+kids&cs=bz

I had such a blast reading all the banter on this caper. It was so entertaining! Anyone who knows me is aware that as far as mysteries go - not my forte. There's no way I could have - in my wildest dreams - have solved this mystery. Hat's off to Gary and all those involved in entertaining the LBNA group! For those who were bored - the delete button is the way to go. There are those who appreciate being entertained.

Enjoy!
donutz716

Gary & Elizabeth Anderson wrote:
At 02:57 PM 6/29/2007, mizscarlet731@yahoo.com wrote:
>-
>Some of us were just not interested in this and are still not
>interested in it.
> >
> > Thanks, donutz716, and uneksia. I considered sending a post to the

Oh, I can understand someone not being interested,,,, it does seem
strange to me, though, why someone would read and REPLY to posts on
subjects they aren't interested in. :-)

Gary

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]






---------------------------------
Don't pick lemons.
See all the new 2007 cars at Yahoo! Autos.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]